Congress Considering Punishing States that Do Not Force Vaccines

CONGRESS WANTS TO CONDITION
FEDERAL FUNDING ON VACCINATION MANDATES
Violating Informed Consent is a
Crime Against Humanity

The Nuremberg Code requires actual voluntary Informed Consent for all medical interventions, including vaccination:

“… voluntary consent… is absolutely essential… the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion…”[1]

Members of the Congress of the United States now seek to effectively abrogate this International Law of Informed Consent through the “Vaccinate All Children Act of 2019” — HR 2527.[2]

This bill imposes on all of the States of the Union a

“condition [for] receipt … of preventive health services grants on the establishment of a State requirement for students in public elementary and secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices [ACIP]…”

Under this bill, which currently has the support of 70 members of Congress, for a State to receive Federal “preventive health services” it must impose vaccine mandates forcing each student to receive each and every vaccine “recommended” by the Federal Government’s ACIP.  Currently there are over 30 such recommended vaccines, with over 50 injections.[3]

The bill does not provide for any religious or philosophical exemptions to vaccination. It permits very limited medical excuses by a physician, but only “to the satisfaction of the individual in charge of the health program at the student’s school…” Thus, the decision to vaccinate or not is taken from the parents and physicians and put into the hands of government employees.

While the bill does not mention the universal right to Informed Consent, which is beyond the power of Congress or the States to abrogate, its provisions force the States to implement further draconian vaccine mandates.

For example, even before Congress considers HR2527 California and New York are following Australia in conditioning public “benefits” (like government education and places of public accommodation) and public assistance to the needy on subservience to the full course of government “recommended” vaccines.

It should be noted that the United States Government is an interested party in the vaccine business, holding over 220 vaccine patents.[4] Members of the government committee (the ACIP) that “recommends” vaccines include individuals who personally hold vaccine patents and who stand to reap millions of dollars in vaccine royalties from their “recommendations.”[5]

The potential for corruption should be obvious.

That is why the Law requires truly informed consent for any medical intervention.  The universal right of Informed Consent trumps any legislative abrogation of religious, philosophical or medical exemptions.  No legislature, whether State or Federal has legitimate authority to deny the right of Informed Consent.  Any government that does so is engaging in the same Crime against Humanity for which the United States tried, and in some cases hung, the Nazi Doctors.

For over a hundred years the Law has been clear:  no medical intervention without Informed Consent.  As recently as 2013 the Supreme Court held,

Even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish the… privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing the… skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…”  Missouri vs McNeely, 569 US 141 (2013)

Where there is risk there must be voluntary consent.

Our Courts have consistently held that vaccination is “unavoidably unsafe”.[6] That legal determination is supported by hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific papers.  The science is clear:  vaccines are inherently risky.[7]

But, we are told, vaccines stopped the terrible pandemic diseases of past centuries. Did they? Or did better nutrition, sanitation and hygiene end the threat of such diseases?

Vaccine mandates are neither good law nor good science.  No one should ever be forced to submit to pseudo-scientific medical interventions in violation of the right to Informed Consent.

If you want to keep your right to Informed Consent you must assert it:  https://tinyurl.com/AVDcard.

——————————

[1] The Nuremberg Code was submitted by the United States prosecutors for the infamous Nazi Doctors Trial of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials of war criminals at the end of World War II.  The US Military Court accepted the Code as a legally binding statement of the Law of Informed Consent. Later the terms of the code were accepted as part of the Institutional Review Board laws in the United States and as part of the United Nations’ Bioethics Declaration.  http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html

[2] https://www.congress.gov/116/bills/hr2527/BILLS-116hr2527ih.pdf

[3] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/imz/child-adolescent.html

[4] http://drrimatruthreports.com/us-government-vaccine-patents/

[5] https://www.lawfirms.com/resources/environment/environment-health/cdc-members-own-more-50-patents-connected-vaccinations

[6] See Justice Sotomayor’s 2011 dissent in Bruesewitz vs Wyeth, where she discusses the history of “unavoidably unsafe.”

[7] https://tinyurl.com/DrRimaIndiaPaper

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of