Are Comments About the Lack of Vaccine Safety the
Same as “Sexually Explicit, Violent and Threatening Messages”?
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
You Already Have a Vaccine Exemption
Use It! More Here: https://tinyurl.com/AVDcard
UPI Story from July 2, 2019 
“Massive anti-vaccination campaigns are taking place all around the world, and experts say social media organizations need to do more to stop them. The Salzburg Statement on Vaccination Acceptance, published Tuesday in the Journal of Health Communication, has called on companies like Google and Facebook to better identify misinformation related to vaccine safety. The statement, penned by a group of global scientists, also recommends government agencies around the world provide better mandatory immunization programs.”
This is from the actual “Salzburg Statement on Vaccine Acceptance”
“We call upon major search engines and social media organizations to: Develop principles that distinguish “levels of evidence” in the vaccine information they provide so that they can improve identification of disproven/inaccurate false claims about vaccine safety for their users that have led to the return [sic] of childhood diseases, just as they do for sexually explicit, violent and threatening messages.” 
I posted this at the comments section on that article:
Since our courts have held that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” and the insurance industry refuses to insure vaccine safety, and the FDA has failed for over 30 years to produce even one vaccine safety report as mandated by Congress in the 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, I assume any honest media company will put the following notice on all postings that support vaccination:
“Unproven medical intervention. Unavoidably unsafe. Uninsurable risk. You have the universal right of Informed Consent, guaranteed under the Nuremberg Code, to refuse any and all vaccines “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.” 
No one should be penalized for vaccine conscientious objection.
The Globalist Control System is ratcheting up the attack on Vaccine Conscientious Objection. The choice is stark: either stand for the right of Informed Consent or stand in the Docket at Nuremberg with the Nazi Doctors. Where do you stand?
Your Advance Vaccine Directive Here:
More about the law of Informed Consent here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/a-brief-for-informed-consent/
Thus, each free person has the absolute right to refuse any medical intervention for reasons of conscience, or for no reason at all. No legislature has power to restrict the right of Informed Consent.
If that conscientious objection is based on personal religious beliefs then the Federal Civil Rights Acts and their requirement that government accommodate religious beliefs come into play.
I’ve written about that here: http://www.opensourcetruth.com/zero-vax-tolerance-violates-your-rights/
As then Attorney General Sessions said in a formal Attorney General Opinion:
“Laws protecting religious freedom and conscience rights are just empty words on paper if they aren’t enforced. No one should be forced to choose between helping sick people and living by one’s deepest moral or religious convictions, and the new division will help guarantee that victims of unlawful discrimination find justice. For too long, governments big and small have treated conscience claims with hostility instead of protection, but change is coming and it begins here and now.”
If the State government is persecuting religious vaccine conscientious objectors, it’s time to complain to the Civil Rights Conscience Division, right here: https://www.hhs.gov/conscience/index.html
Share this message widely with this link: http://www.opensourcetruth.com/warnings-on-vaccine-objectors-speech/
 Quote from Nuremberg Code – http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/nurcode.html