The DOJ Sues Natural Solutions Over Nano Silver
We’ve Been Itching to Get FDA in Court for a Long Time…
Deep State agencies like the DoJ and FDA target leading health freedom advocates like the Natural Solutions Foundation — while we are mesmerized by Votegate — the great vote counting scandal of 2020.
The Department of Justice is suing Natural Solutions Foundation, Dr. Rima and me over what they claim are nano silver “claims”. They contend that, for example, sharing a declassified piece of research in which the US Defense Department showed that in the presence of our Nano Silver 10 PPM, viruses do not attach to cells, penetrate them or replicate, is somehow making a “claim” that Nano Silver “treats” or “cures” COVID.
If this sounds like what they tried to do to us in 2014 with Ebola, you are right. But this time, they are actually suing us for exercising free speech and sharing public information.
Rest assured that we have not come this far just to back down: not only do we intend to litigate the issue, we intend to counter-claim, defending Nano Silver as nutrient support for an effective immune system.
There are a lot of moving parts to this suit and you will be hearing much more about it in days to come. Of course, the government’s attacks on non-drug options to standard treatments are, in our opinion, nothing more than part of a concerted attempt to short-circuit legal safeguards, allowing the “Fast Tracked” Warp Speed COVID vaccines onto the market without adequate testing.
The drug companies want EUAs (Emergency Use Authorizations.) for their shady products. But to legally grant an EUA, the FDA has to be sure that there are no other effective treatment or control strategies. But there are. Many of them. And, strongest of all, for health in every situation, is a vibrant immune system. We believe it is accurate to state that Nutrient Nano Silver supports that kind of immune system, whatever virus or bacterium is lurking about.
These EUAs, by the way, are granted without the usual safety procedures, intended to protect the public, on the premise that since there is nothing else available, whatever risk to the public is involved, it is worth it.
This in the face of the special double immunity granted by Congress to vaccine makers who are pretty much immune to meaningful consequences of public harm – of any kind.
We told our supporters that we believe that a healthy immune system protects against illness and that seems a bridge too far for the DoJ and FDA although vast amounts of scientific literature supports that contention.
We believe a much better and far safer alternative to dangerous, “unavoidably unsafe” vaccines, especially novel gene-editing, vectored, DNA, RNA and adenovirus vaccines, is Community Immunity. Unlike the imaginary “herd immunity”, Community Immunity is both real and powerful: it is the gradual strengthening of the general response of the population to the threat and the gradual weakening of the threat presented by the organism to the population. It is a normal and expectable development of “peaceful coexistence” which organisms learn to accomplish over time.
Community Immunity can only come about if large numbers of people are exposed to the virus and allowed to develop antibodies naturally. Since a strong personal immune system which meets and then defeats a threatening organism like a virus is a prerequisite to the development of Community Immunity, the better our nutrition and immune competence is, the better we all will fare. Lockdowns, by the way, actively threaten Community Immunity.
We are not happy that the DoJ and FDA have chosen to file suit against us but, frankly, it turns out that it is quite a useful opportunity. You see, although it seems as if they have no limitations on them, in fact they do. And among those limits is something called the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) which allows us to file Citizens Petitions which are to be answered within certain time limits.
Our powerhouse committee of breathtakingly experienced attorneys this week decided that we should respond to this lawsuit by raising certain important issues involving pending Administrative Procedures Act Citizens Petitions which the FDA seems to be ignoring.
You see, in March, 2019, we filed an FDA Citizens Petition calling for the immediate suspension of all vaccine approvals in the US. They are, we believe, unlawful since the required annual safety and efficacy reports — called for by law since 1986—have NEVER been submitted.
Since the petition was filed there has been no response although FDA’s permitted response period has elapsed.
You can read this important document here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/Vax-Suspend-APA-Petition.2019.pdf
Because there are other means of treating the disease other than poorly tested, potentially dangerous experimental vaccines, and the failure of the government to respond to this urgent March 2019 Petition, we are considering seeking a court injunction against the first COVID vaccine Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) which was requested by the drug company involved this Friday. We oppose the EUA as the requirements in the law allowing the EUA have not been met.
FDA does not want people to know about Nano Silver’s impact and has attacked us now for making what it claims are unapproved “health claims” inferred, we contend, from our exercise of free speech.
Because the FDA wields such enormous power, we have removed Nano Silver from our website until these issues are resolved and apologize for any inconvenience that might cause.
On October 12, 2020, we submitted a second petition to be able to make a “reduction of risk of viral infection” health claim for nano silver. Once again, no response has been forthcoming from FDA.
You can read that Petition here: https://www.nsfmarketplace.com/2020silverreductionofriskpetition/
Do you think it was a coincidence that the DOJ civil complaint against us was filed on or about 17 November of this year?
To fully respond to the government’s rash and, we believe, ill-advised law suit against us, we will, we MUST, continue to advocate for health freedom by going full bore against what we perceive to be unreasonable suppression of free speech and bastardization of science in favor of huge companies’ interests.
That means, however, that we need to raise substantial funding. Resisting real government intrusion requires real funds.
You know Natural Solutions Foundation, Dr. Rima and I have stood courageously for health freedom: We intend to continue that stand and to do so, we need your generous and continuing help.
We are not defending just nutrient silver. We are defending your right to know the truth and speak it without being cut down for it.
While members of the legal team are willing to work with us, substantial costs and fees need to be covered. This is your fight. Help here: [LINK].
We will keep you posted every step of the way.
After all, this is every step your battle.
Our Team is astonishing: Our side is honored to be represented by Larry Becraft, Esq. of Huntsville, Alabama. Counsel Becraft is widely known as “The Dean of the Patriot Lawyers.” He and the legal team represent a broad spectrum of experience in litigating against Federal intervention and for freedom.
Ironically, while a number of well-known “talk radio” and televangelist voices were accused of making “treatment or prevention of disease” claims for various silver products, we are, to the best of our knowledge, the only advocates for nano silver who have been sued by the government for making health claims. Ironic, too, is the great care with which we have made sure to word our communications to carefully avoid “treatment or prevention disease” claims.
Dr. Rima does not believe that Nano Silver is a medical treatment for any disease and has repeatedly said so, insisting, instead, that Nano Silver, is a nutrient which super charges the immune system.
The government believes, apparently, if we remind people that a Nano Silver supported immune system means you need not worry about infections, we, the DOJ asserts, must be making a disease treatment or prevention claim. We respectfully, but strongly, disagree.
Yes, this case is about Nano Silver. But it is also about our right to speak truth without fear of legal consequences for things we did not say or imply. And your right to hear the truth.
As the Supreme Court reminded us in Thompson v Western States, (2002):
“If the First Amendment means anything, it means that regulating speech must be a last – not first – resort. *** We have previously rejected the notion that the Government has an interest in preventing the dissemination of truthful commercial information in order to prevent members of the public from making bad decisions with the information. *** “Even if the Government did argue that it had an interest in preventing misleading advertisements, this interest could be satisfied by the far less restrictive alternative of requiring each … to be labeled with a warning that the [substance]… had not undergone FDA testing and that its risks were unknown.”
You can help us show the government that the First Amendment is important to us and that Nano Silver is strong nutrient support for a normal immune system, not a “drug” intended to prevent or cure any disease.
Further, through your support of this case, we can make it clear that there are other ways to deal with a viral threat – including not getting the disease associated with it because your immune system is working normally.
You will really be helping yourself
Yours in health and freedom,
Ralph Fucetola JD
Natural Solutions Trustee