WHO will assume total control of future pandemics. Medical doctor was forced to spend 25 days in a psych hospital because he said vaccines were unsafe. 15 players exit Miami Open tennis tournament.
Steve Kirsch, April 6th
Before I get into the insanity parts, I do have two pieces of good news:
- I just met with a member of the California legislature who is a critical thinker: Senator Josh Becker. I’ve known Josh for years. What a rare treat to find someone who hasn’t “lost it” after they get elected to office.
- If we can also elect (or re-elect) people like these, we’ll be starting to gather some good momentum:
- Senator Ron Johnson (Wisconsin)
- Dr. Michael Huang to the California Senate
- Michele Westlander Quaid to US Congress (CA District 24)
- Dr. Brian Tyson to US Congress (CA District 25)
- Mark Meuser to the US Senate (California)
Insane news item #1: US government to cede control to WHO for future pandemics. This is not a joke.
OK, now the insane news. The US government is about to hand over the keys to the pandemic response to the goofballs at the WHO. The WHO, as we all remember, did not spend a dime on the fastest, safest, and cheapest way to end the pandemic: using repurposed drugs. Even today, they can’t seem to figure out that there are dozens of proven early treatment protocols that save lives. They are corrupt. So why would world governments want to give them the power to exclusively coordinate the pandemic response for the next pandemic?
The bad news: this will soon be a done deal.
Thanks to Mike Yeadon for alerting me to this.
Here’s Mike’s message to me (excerpt):
I’ve heard about this from half a dozen sources & I’m sorry to say that the concerns expressed are wholly justified.
It’s a mad idea, but since certain individuals & nations have pretty much taken over the WHO, I think it’s a certainty that, if this new treaty gets signed, within a few years at most, a “public health emergency of International concern” will be declared, and all currently sovereign nations will become controlled subsidiaries of WHO.
No government should even have the power to throw their country over to a third party. If that happened, they’d never give it back.
U.K. parliament signed up to emergency powers on the occasion of the first lockdown over two years ago. That temporary bill has never been repealed. We have no rights whatsoever if they decide we don’t. This is the main reason we emigrated.
Here’s the best practical reason not to sign such a treaty, aside from its anti-democratic central problem:
Imagine there’s a new pathogen spreading across the world. Nobody, anywhere, knows what the best response should be. By definition it’s not known.
History teaches us that we alight most rapidly upon probable best courses of action, not from modeling, but from empirical evidence. Running a large number of experiments, based on the smartest public health, medical & scientific brains, will quickly tell us what kinds of responses are helpful & which are not. Maintaining very good communication makes sure lessons learned are shared quickly.
The worst conceivable response would be to place the decision making power in the hands of a single body. They’ll likely run one experiment. We’ll never learn the counterfactual.
On this basis, I don’t even understand why anyone would fall for the idiotic notion that letting WHO have the controls would be a great idea. Even if they were honest & competent.
Please let me know if I can help in any way.
Here’s the amazing substack article that describes what is going on. You won’t find this anywhere in the mainstream media. It’s a long article, but really well done.