This is What Tyranny Looks Like

Assert Your Right of Informed Consent:

New York Parents Who Question Vaccines  Viciously Attacked by School Bureaucracy

NOTE: This article contains vitally important information for you and your family and friends.  Please share as widely as possible now.

Every parent, has the right – and the responsibility – to make health decisions for his/her children. Every person has the right to refuse ANY medical intervention for him/herself or his/her minor child(ren). That legally protected right is called the Right of Informed Consent.

Like the speed of light, the Right of Informed Consent is not just a good idea, it’s the law in 194 countries, including the United States. Why? Because each of those countries has ratified – that is, formally accepted as its own overriding law – an international set of laws known collectively as the Geneva Convention.

The Geneva Convention places the obligation on ratifying countries to adopt and protect the Right of Informed Consent.
And, try as they might, no nation, no state, no school board, no official, can wipe that binding legislation away by asserting that it can if you assert your right correctly.

Before we get to New York State’s advancing vaccine tyranny, you also need to know that in the US, and many other countries, an Advance Medical Directive is also protected by law if it, too, is asserted correctly.

Now to the newest chapter in medical tyranny: New York’s assault on truth, justice, the American Way and International Law via its illegal and anti-science vaccine stance.

We previously reported on the NY school district that sent letters to vaccine conscientious objector families threatening to “turn them over” to the State’s “Child Protective [sic] Service” (CPS) — an agency widely believed to be a recruiting grounds for pedophilia.

Earlier this year, the New York State legislature repealed long-standing religious conscientious objection exemptions to vaccine mandates in one day, without public hearings.  Somehow, since then the State’s various agencies have felt empowered to punish parents who seek to preserve their conscientious objections, and to assert their legally protected Right of Informed Consent,  to forced vaccination.

Despite the critically important fact that the State’s highest courts and the federal courts have not ruled on the legality of this legislative repeal and the subsequent mandates, the agencies are terrifying and bullying parents by threatening them with dire consequences if they do not yield up their children’s bodies to forced vaccines.

In addition to the CPS threat, and the targeting of the Orthodox Jewish Community in New York, we now have at least one case where the school nurse has taken the position that the universal and legally protected Right of Informed Consent somehow no longer applies in New York.

Did the New York legislature  have the legal authority to abolish an exemption it had granted decades ago? Perhaps. But, to our knowledge, this is the first time we have seen any member of the medical community IN THE UNITED STATES assert that the State can authorize school authorities to ignore the Right of Informed Consent.We saw it in Nazi Germany, of course, so it  is particularly distressing that the school officials who take this position possibly do not know that they now stand “in the Docket” at Nuremberg with the Nazi doctors who were convicted after World War II specifically of the Crime Against Humanity of ignoring the Right of Informed Consent.

In the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials, conducted, in fact, by the United States, those members of the medical profession found guilty of that crime were, under US authority and law, hanged.

The Nuremberg Code, binding on the United States and every State in the Union, is abundantly clear on the matter:

“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion…”

Nonetheless, the school nurse told one conscientious objector in writing: “Our OCFS licensor came in this morning so I was able to talk directly to her. She said that the advanced directive that you have would not be valid related to the fact that it is not signed by a doctor…”

She is, of course, referring to the Advance Vaccine Directive Card presented by the mother of a child in order to exempt him from mandatory vaccination.

Of course, the school nurse and the “OCFS licensor” are both absolutely wrong. An Advance Medical Directive is an assertion of YOUR medical decision, not an expression of someone else’s permission for you to make that decision.

After all, the whole point of an advanced medical directive is to tell the doctors and other health care providers about what a person is giving – or refusing – Informed Consent for.  Requiring a doctor to sign the advanced directive completely negates its purpose. It is not about permission from a doctor or State agent or anyone else; it is about each person’s universal, protected right to grant or refuse Informed Consent, for any reason, or no reason at all. Period. End of issue.

Here is what Wikipedia says about the status of an advance healthcare directive:  it “is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health… In the U.S. it has a legal status in itself..”

Wait! There’s a catch to this! Since we know from current Supreme Court cases that one must assert the Right of Informed Consent or it will be deemed waived,  we know that allowing State education officials to ignore an expression of Informed Consent (or, more specifically, an expression of refusal to grant Informed Consent) is a clear violation of the First Amendment.

In one recent case the Supreme Court stated clearly

Even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish the… privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing the… skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (Missouri v McNeely, page 15; emphasis added).

The Natural Solutions Foundation exists to support your right of Health Freedom, the premise that you control what happens to your own body.  And the Right of Informed Consent is central to that Right.  That is why we created the Advance Vaccine Directive to allow you to assert that Right correctly. Remember,  unless you assert your right to Informed Consent, it will be ignored.

Learn more here:

If you are not a member of our Health Freedom community, join us now at and look for our complementary newsletter in your inbox.

Urgent: Share this message using this link:

For more on threatening parents with CPS as an illegal punishment for questioning vaccines, see:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *