Jacobson vs Fauci – No, You Do Not Have to Submit to the Jab!

Lies:
Jacobson Protects Vaccine Mandates in a Pandemic
Gene-Editing Vaccines are Safe and/or Effective
– You Can – and Should – Trust the ‘Experts’

URGENT: SHARE THIS INFO!
http://www.opensourcetruth.com/you-do-not-have-to-submit-to-the-jab/

Opinion, Ralph Fucetola, JD
Trustee, Natural Solutions Foundation September 5, 2020

You can see it floating on the wind, like some disease miasma, the rumor that the only thing that will “save us” is a barely safety-tested gene-editing COVID vaccine, with tracking chips, using a new and untested DNA-modifying technology to change the human genome.  “What” as Natural Solutions Foundation Medical Director Rima Laibow, MD has said, “could possibly go wrong?”  The question is rhetorical.  Good Doctors like Dr. Rima know that the first rule of humane medicine is Do No Harm. She also knows that everything could go wrong.

Wrong, that is, for us. But if the vaccines harm us in our hundreds of millions (and we have no meaningful legal remedies should that happen), and if huge numbers of people die, that is just dandy for the controllers and depopulationists.

Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates, along with the others in their dangerous circles, most assuredly are both would-be controllers and depopulationists, according to their own statements.

Political physicians, like Dr. Fauci, however, have long forgotten their oaths [1]. Behind the scenes and in the glare of the mass media spotlight they are ceaselessly trying to convince the public not to think, not to exercise the Right of Informed Consent, but to bow their heads and obey.

Whether they are telling us to:

–   Not mask
–   Mask
–  Test
–  Not test
–  Test again
–  Not test again,

the point is to train us to just do whatever we are told to do. 

Whether that is wearing masks that we know conclusively do more harm than good [2] or accepting the “unavoidably unsafe” COVID vax, the mad vaxx mandators just want our obedience.

Isn’t it interesting that the same people who have been telling us that there are too many people on the planet and that vaccines can help reduce population [3] now want us to willingly accept a vaccine that Prof. Sir John Bell, a leading researcher working on the Oxford COVID-19 vaccine in England told a UK Channel 4 interviewer would “not sterilize the entire population, only about 60%” ? [4]

And isn’t it interesting that these same people and organizations, WHO, GAVI, Gates, Fauci, PATH, have been exposed before the High Court of India [5] , in the Philippines [6], Kenya [7] and elsewhere because of their genocidal use of vaccines to sterilize the uninformed and unwilling population?

And isn’t it interesting that, Jacobson, the lead case ASSERTING our Right to be protected from a vaccine that would harm us is misquoted and distorted continually by the mad vaxx mandators  (such as Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz [8]) as if it validated mandatory vaccines when it does no such thing?

The propaganda war is well under way. But the truth is that the Supreme Court did not say that we must be mandated in time of pandemic. And, by the way, we are actually not, again, despite the propaganda to the contrary, in a pandemic, according to the standard definition.

Although large numbers of people have died, they have not died from COVID-19.  They have died from other conditions or from the horrifyingly dangerous “treatment” of the assumed COVID-19 disease.

And what will the next President of the United States likely do about mandating vaccination? The presidential candidates are making their views known, or obscuring them; sometimes it is hard to know which.  We have been keeping tally of what they are saying and are reporting it here at Open Source Truth. [9]

Whether they are Big Pharma sock puppets or not, the key legal issue for all of us, in my opinion, is the universal Right of Informed Consent, correctly identified as the “Defining Issue of the 21st Century” by Natural Solutions’ founder, Maj. Gen. Bert Stubblebine. III (US Army).

That right has been acknowledged by the US Courts, up to and including the US Supreme Court for over a hundred years.  Moreover, it is enshrined in international law.  I presented a paper reviewing that history  of the Right of Informed Consent in the US at the Libertarian Scholars’ Conference, Kings College, Manhattan, last October. [10]

Jacobson, the lead case on mandated vaccines, was decided by the Supreme Court in 1905, before the modern law articulating Informed Consent was fully developed.  And while there is language in Jacobson vs Massachusetts that gives some support to the mad vaxxers, Jacobson only supports them  if they ignore what the case actually saysAnd ignore it they do.

I was listening to Fox News earlier today when one of the talking heads opined that the government could force us all to receive the COVID vaccine any time the authorities wanted to, based on that case.  That’s not what Jacobson says.  What Jacobson says is that you can be fined (in that case, $5.00) if you refuse to take a mandated vaccine during a pandemic.  It does not say that agents of the government can pierce your skin without your consent.

It does say that the courts are “not without power” to intervene

“…if it be apparent or can be shown with reasonable certainty that he is not at the time a fit subject of vaccination or that vaccination, by reason of his then condition, would seriously impair his health or probably cause his death.”

The Supreme Court indicated that it was not deciding anything about the safety of vaccines, only the bare question of the extent of the state police power during a pandemic. Later courts have told us that all vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe.”

It is important to note that according to the CDC published definition of a pandemic, the COVID outbreak no longer meets that criteria. In fact, it never did. It met the urgent propaganda war definition of a Pandemic: whatever we say over and over. That is, however, NOT a pandemic in which 7% of the vulnerable population must be susceptible to being killed by the pandemic for it to BE a pandemic. So even if pandemic mandatory vaccines were acceptable, which they are not, here is no legal excuse for a forced COVID vaccine.

Surprise! This is not a pandemic and has never been one. But even in a pandemic, your body is not the property of the mad vaxx mandators. It is yours and the State has both the ability and the responsibility to protect that ownership.

More than a hundred years after Jacobson, the Supreme Court again made it clear that controlling your body is your right.  In McNeely vs Missouri (2013) the high court reminded us,

Even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish the… privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing the… skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…”

What else is Dr. Fauci wrong about?  Pretty much everything except that the COVID-19 vaccine may very well not work. [11]

His latest idiosyncratic take on medicine is that seeking what doctors call “community immunity” (which is is mislabeling as “herd immunity”, quite a different thing and a myth at that) [12], [13] will not protect us from contagious disease. Implicitly, only The Vaccine will, despite the fact that Dr. Fauci has stated publicly that the vaccine may not work. That at least is true: it will not, but it will alter our genes forever whether it protects us from COVID-19 or not.

Only when we are allowed to be free to live our lives as normally as possible, allowing our properly supported immune systems to protect us, we will develop personal and community immunity, as we have to all previous pandemic diseases.  Only irrational and petty “lockdown” and “masking” rules can prevent that.

As far as I am concerned, it is time to open the windows, let in the light, and shout out, “I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore.” 

Demand your right to make your own decisions about your own body.  Refuse to cooperate with the lockdown.  Learn how to assert your rights to be both vaccine and mask free:  https://tinyurl.com/maskexemption.

Yours in health and freedom,

Counsel Ralph

—–

[1] http://www.HealthKeepersOath.org

[2] http://www.opensourcetruth.com/dr-rimas-masking-ebook/

[3] https://youtu.be/PAJ3YhlUegk

[4] https://www.channel4.com/news/im-hopeful-were-going-to-start-to-get-readout-early-in-autumn-as-to-whether-this-thing-works-or-not-prof-sir-john-bell-on-oxford-vaccine

[5]  https://thegoodnewstoday.org/bill-gates-faces-trial-in-india-for-illegally-testing-tribal-children-with-vaccines/

[6] http://whale.to/vaccine/ster.html

[7] https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-un-tetanus-vaccine/5431664

[8] https://www.cnsnews.com/index.php/commentary/wesley-j-smith/dershowitz-wrong-government-cant-compel-you-take-covid-19-vaccine

[9] http://www.opensourcetruth.com/the-presidential-candidates-on-informed-consent/

[10] http://www.inhere.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Informed-Consent.paper_.1a.pdf

[11] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/12/fauci-tells-congress-no-guarantee-the-coronavirus-vaccine-will-be-effective.html

[12] http://dangersofvaccines.com/herd-immunity/

[13] http://www.opensourcetruth.com/herd-immunity-vs-community-immunity/

 

One thought on “Jacobson vs Fauci – No, You Do Not Have to Submit to the Jab!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.