Control Group to SCOTUS as We Prepare Another Amicus Brief

Control Group Case
Returns to Supreme Court
We Prepare to File in Support

Late last year the Institute for Health Research and the Natural Solutions Foundation submitted Amicus Briefs in support of the Control Group Case.  That Case is now being presented to the United States Supreme Court and we are once again submitting a supporting brief to vindicate the universal right of Informed Consent. This case has the potential to stop mandate madness, but only if we support it vigorously!

Support our efforts and cover our legal fees here:

The Control Group SCOTUS Petition

Here are excerpts from the Petition:

Without a control group to establish a cause-and effect relationship, ‘science’ is not science; it is guesswork. True science requires control groups. Since the start of the National Vaccine Program (enforced by POTUS since 1962), chronic disorders have ballooned in vaccinated people only, while remaining relatively stable in the never-vaccinated population. Logically, the government should study a control group of never-vaccinated people (Petitioners) or at least not destroy their group. Instead, POTUS has directed and managed his subordinates to vaccinate every American, including the control group — the estimated 0.26% threatened group of healthy, never-vaccinated people. Regardless of intentions, and regardless of vaccine safety claims, the President is destroying evidence. He is destroying control groups’ Fifth Amendment right to exist.

The government admits its mandatory vaccines remain unstudied with a never-vaccinated control group, such as Petitioners’ group (“Control Group”).

Petitioners’ Control Group is necessary to prove any causation of harm. Government data confirm more than one-half of vaccinated Americans suffer lifelong debilitating chronic disorders (i.e., heart disease, diabetes, autoimmune disorders). Yet, these disorders affect less than 6% of the never-vaccinated, according to evidence the Control Group introduced in the District Court. Petitioners allege this simple observation proves the President’s mandatory vaccines harm most people. Conversely, for POTUS to continue claiming his vaccines are safe and effective still requires a genuine control group. Either way, the Judiciary is needed to preserve the evidence.

Petitioners requested declaratory and injunctive relief to safeguard their constitutional rights and the scientific method. The lower courts dismissed this case, citing a lack of standing to sue the President, without actually addressing any of the Control
Group’s scientific findings or even recognizing the standing nexus itself: POTUS and his subordinate agencies vigorously develop, approve, purchase, promote, administer, and mandate vaccines harming health.

Therefore:  Do the threatened members of the Control Group have standing to sue the President for systematically destroying their evidence and violating the panoply of their constitutional rights?



79. C. Myriad forms of vaccine human medical experimentation without informed consent are interpreted by the FDA to be ‘legal’ in the United States, so long as the FDA “approves” of the treatment and it is decided by unaccountable bureaucrats that thorough informed consent is unwarranted. And the FDA routinely does approve of human experimentation in this manner. Vaccine manufacturers concur with the FDA in this process.

D. The FDA has contorted their “therapeutic” benefit (“efficacy”) into a preemptive justification for the “approval” of vaccinations under the abusive presumption all Americans who are not “up-to-date” on the CDC-recommended vaccines are currently diseased, and therefore all are in urgent need of the “therapeutic benefit” of vaccines. This is how the FDA circumvents the need for any meaningful or enforceable “informed consent”, and this is why a product that is legally classified as “unavoidably unsafe” is sold in the USA with the slogan “safe”. It’s a ‘relatively safe’ argument, that is only supported by numbers from the VAERS, which we know are over 99% incorrect. The VAERS’ categorically false accounting supplies the “rare” slogan with regard to the frequency of vaccine injuries, which is then used to prop up the “relatively safe” slogan, which results in the fraudulent statement that vaccines are “safe”. This is the level of so-called “informed consent” Americans have enjoyed during this ongoing medical experiment. It amounts to ‘slogan science’.

Our Amicus Brief supporting all vaccine-free individuals is being prepared and MUST be filed in early July.  Of course, we will post it on Open Source Truth.

You may read the entire Petition to the High Court here:

Our previous reporting on the Control Group Case is here: 

Support our efforts and cover our legal fees here:

Ralph Fucetola JD

One thought on “Control Group to SCOTUS as We Prepare Another Amicus Brief

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *