Flu Vax Viral Shedding is a Real Threat – Not Vaxx “Hesitancy”

Dr. Rima Explains What It Means!
Open Source Truth seeks to bring you important, actionable warnings about the issues that impact your health and freedom.  In that spirit, we present to you this important warning from BMJ.com, the online home of the prestigious British Medical Journal [Bold typeface for emphasis.] and Rima Laibow MD’s analysis of what it means, below.

This from BMJ.com:

“Last year’s influenza vaccine also contained the same H3N2 strain as this year’s vaccine (A/Hong Kong/4801/2014 (H3N2)-like virus). Many people would have developed long term IgE mediated sensitization to the H3N2 viral proteins due to last year’s vaccine [1–4]⁠. Those who received the Flublok vaccine can be expected to have an even stronger IgE response due to its 3X viral protein content [5,4]⁠. This year’s vaccine H3N2 proteins would have been neutralized by these IgE antibodies. Thus resulting in the observed low vaccine efficacy. [6⁠]

When a person making anti-H3N2 IgE is infected with H3N2, one can expect the course of the flu to be significantly worse. So the “cytokine storm” being observed in severe cases is likely to be an infection concurrent with an allergic reaction. Death is caused by anaphylactic shock but due to the presence of an infection, it is wrongly classified as septic shock.

In the case of food allergy for example, the allergen exposure can be large enough to cause an immediate hypersensitivity reaction and anaphylactic shock within minutes/hours. In the case of influenza allergy, it may take a day or two for the virus to replicate and produce enough viral exposure for anaphylaxis. So the anaphylaxis unfolds over a couple of days.

‘Self-reported vaccination for the current season was associated with a trend (P < 0.10) toward higher viral shedding in fine-aerosol samples; vaccination with both the current and previous year’s seasonal vaccines, however, was significantly associated with greater fine-aerosol shedding in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0.01). In adjusted models, we observed 6.3 (95% CI 1.9–21.5) times more aerosol shedding among cases with vaccination in the current and previous season compared with having no vaccination in those two seasons.’ [7⁠]”

You can read the full report here:  https://www.bmj.com/content/360/bmj.k1378/rr-15

What does this scientific jargon mean? OST contributor, Rima Laibow MD, told this reporter:

“While the medical establishment sees the development of resistant diseases as an opportunity to develop more ineffective, but profitable, vaccines, holistic doctors know that the risk of such a tactic far outpaces any theoretical benefit.  The pathogens simply continue to evolve around the medical establishment’s “big guns” — toxic vaccines.  That’s why most measles outbreaks, for example, are triggered in “fully vaccinated” populations. More deaths due to the vaccine than the disease!

“Note the reference to ‘higher viral shedding…’ — the vaccine creates the pandemic.

“It’s really a simple clinical problem to solve.  Focus on hygiene, sanitation and good nutrition. Natural immunity protects from disease; “herd immunity” at the point of a hypodermic breeds more deadly diseases. The preeminent nutrient for a powerful immune system is Nano Silver, which Dr. Rima Recommends. Your readers can find it at https://www.NSFmarketplace.com.”

One thought on “Flu Vax Viral Shedding is a Real Threat – Not Vaxx “Hesitancy”

  1. I guess the BMJ article must have gotten some attention, as they have chosen to rename it “Influenza vaccines and dengue-like disease” rather than “Influenza vaccines seem to be modifying influenza into a dangerous dengue-like disease” as shown in the screen shot above. I am sure someone was outraged that the words “dangerous” and “vaccines” were appearing in the same headline. Can’t have anything suggesting vaccines could ever be anything but safe and effective.

Leave a Reply to Bill Poster Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *