COVID-19: Who’s Telling You the Truth – and Who’s Not?

COVID-19: Mainstream “News” Either Flawed or Fraud
Misinformation… Or Disinformation?

Cat Mask? Really? But is a Human Mask Any Better? 

Everything on this site represents our current best understanding of real information about COVID-19, correcting mis- and dis-information Natural Solutions Foundation Trustees

Do Your Friends a Favor: Share the Link

So far, virtually everything we have seen in the Mass Media about the Chinese Coronavirus — COVID-19 has been either flawed or fraud.  

Some of the misinformation is fairly innocuous, such as the Fox News report about cats in China wearing sanitary face masks. [1]  NPR [mis]informs us that the novel virus, with a 3% kill rate and great virulence, developed at an “exotic” (aka “wet”) market in Wuhan China.[2]
By January 30, 2020, Lancet was reporting a staggering 11% mortality rate by studying deaths in a Chinese ICU. [3]

Then we hear CSNBC learnedly intone the absurd WHO line that what is now called COVID-19 developed in bats and jumped to the humans who wanted to eat them[3] or a pangolin [4] although they hibernate in winter so it seems unlikely. Or, says an article in a scientific journal, it could be from a snake. [5]

The bats being blamed are, interestingly, horseshoe bats, not native to the Wuhan region.  They would have had to migrate in large colonies over 600 hundred miles, something that bats are not known to do. In fact, such a migration is, according to students of bat behavior, ‘improbable’.

Although vilified for raising the issues by the Mainstream Media, some, including Senator Tom Cotton [7] accused, and continue to accuse,[8] China of the accidental — or perhaps intentional — release of a weaponized virus from China’s only Level 4 Biosecurity Laboratory (the highest level of biosecurity), located in Wuhan, in close proximity to the supposedly guilty wet market.  Extremely Mainstream Media CBC reported that two scientists, both Chinese nationals, were caught stealing corona viruses and passing them on to China from Canada’s only Level 4 Biosecurity lab in July, 2019. This, of course, would give China plenty of time to create an active laboratory process to weaponize the virus, should they choose to.  [9]

Perhaps they would expose that very species of bat, specifically 605 of them housed in the Wuhan Center for Disease Control (WCDC), to a weaponized virus in a facility a mere 280m (928 feet) from the guilty wet market.

According to ‘The possible origins of 2019-nCoV coronavirus,’ a new report today by  Chinese scientists scholars Botao Xiao and Lei Xiao, both of the State-sponsored South China University of Technology in Guangzhou, claims that these diseased animals attacked a worker who noted blood on his skin and self-quarantined. However, WCDC is also very close to Union Hospital, at which the first group of doctors became infected with what is now called COVID-19. [10]

They state “the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan.” 

It is interesting that the paper referred to above has been removed from in short order (apparently on the same day that it was published by these respected researches) and the link now leads here:


Similarly, when the crucially important paper documenting the genotype of the corona virus genetically modified to include four attachment points from the HIV-1 Virus (previously reported on this site), that important paper, by a group of well-respected Indian scientists, disappeared within hours of its publication, having been withdrawn.[11]

Regardless of the pressure applied to the authors to withdraw their paper or the measures taken to force a journal to retract a publication, if the facts within that paper are true and can be replicated, the anti-science-for-hire falls away.

Here is the illustration provided by the authors of the HIV-1 insertion paper:

We are following these developments and have documented recent data points at our dedicated page,

Although others are breathlessly reporting rising infection and death figures, we find those figures so unreliable and distorted that we are not focusing on them.

We are not reporting on  the alleged numerical spread of the virus at this time since the figures released by the Chinese Government appear to be highly in accurate.  A cover-up appears to have been in place since late last year, before the Western Media first began to report.  These are, for what they are worth, readily available on line.

However, we do find the following important analysis by Los Alamos National Laboratories [12] of note in which they document that the index case in Japan vacationed shortly before symptoms began in Hawaii and then returned home to bring the disease to Japan, where the patient was hospitalized.

They find that there is a  99% probability a Japanese tourist in Hawaii acquired his SARS-CoV-2 (aka COVID19) infection during the nearly 2 week period he was in Hawaii on vacation. Calculating from the known time from exposure to development of disease, the researchers at Los Alamos concluded that there will be a million cases in Hawaii by the beginning of March:

This means that 99.9% of those developing symptoms will do so within 11 days of exposure.  Since the infected person was exposed in Hawaii, that means that a previously undetected community infection was already present there before and during the tourist’s visit.

The earliest likely time of COVID-19 infection in Hawaii would be, according to the researchers, December 31, 2019.

The Los Alamos analysis notes, ‘in China it is estimated that early in the epidemic the number of infected individuals doubled every 2.4 days, and the R0 value is likely to be between 4.7 and 6.6′

The RO is the basic reproductive rate, or the number of cases of infection that a single patient is likely to cause.

That means that, if the same conditions that govern RO in China apply in Hawaii, and assuming that the Japanese patient was infected by a person in Hawaii who was the ONLY person with COVID-19 at the time (an unlikely and overly conservative assumption), the Los Alamos study  says that by February 14, 2020,  there would have been approximately 48 to 213 undetected SARS-CoV2 cases in Hawaii.

It should be remembered that it is unclear whether those replication numbers apply in Hawaii’s climate. The RO may be the same, higher or lower in various climatic, genetic, nutritional, pollution and other environments and various populations (the young, the old, males, females, those with immune system compromise, various medications, etc.) may be more or less vulnerable to infection and severity of clinical disease.

However, using those conservative parameters, the study suggests that by early March there will be 1 million COVID-19-infected people.

Avoiding contact with infected people, pets, droplets, etc., is obviously a good idea but, given the ease with which the virus currently spreads and the reality of world-travel, it is highly unlikely that many people will not be exposed to COVID-19 in the near future.

We know that hand washing is usually a good idea, but droplet transmission makes it less than a perfect response.

We know that in order to be effective against an air-borne contagion, the mask must filter out the viruses and kill or inactivate them.  We know that virtually no mask actually does that. But we also know that in every pandemic, there are some who do not get the disease although, like everyone else, they have been exposed.

The Black Death (Yersinia pestis) did not kill ALL of Europe, after all, only between a half and a third.

The others either did not get sick or did not succumb to the disease because of their immune status.

And we know, too, that there are substances, natural and non-toxic, which make it virtually impossible for an organism like COVID-19 to attach to a cell (in spite of the inserted HIV-1 “hold fasts”) so that it cannot insert its own genes into the cell and replicate.

One of those normal-immune-system-supporting substances is Nano Silver 10 PPM, available at It is a profoundly important data-based immune support.

We note that the World Health Organization, WHO, during the 2014 Ebola outbreak issued a statement that, during a pandemic, it is ethical to try even unverified interventions that may offer potential benefit. [13],[14]

While our assessment is that face masks are a placebo without evidence-based protective value, for example, in the face of COVID-19 exposure, we provide information so that you can make your own decisions at our dedicated website,  For example, sanitary face masks, whether worn by cats or people, are critically discussed.  [15]

It is clear that discerning the truth about Coronavirus  is difficult to discern in the Mainstream Media, aka the Media of Mass Deception, coupled with the distortions of national and commercial interests designed specifically to keep you from discovering that truth,  the sources we rely upon at  have shown themselves to be, in our view, more truthful than the misinformation and disinformation being peddled over the Mass Media.

Furthermore, we bring our combined medical, legal and political experience to this welter of information.   We make every effort to bring you what we believe to be the best information available so that you can make the best choices available.

You are urged to share this link with everyone.  And let us know what you’ve discovered about the misinformation and disinformation that you are finding.  We rely on an aware public to express the Truth About Coronavirus.

Tips and information are welcome at

And we urge you to join Dr. Rima’s powerful new email list HERE to be assured that you will remain in the loop. 

Those who really do not want you to have this information have, quite literally, chopped dozens of thousands of people at a whack off our list.  So we need your help in reaching everyone who needs this vital information and helping us rebuild the list of subscribed people who get our complementary news letter.

Once you share this link,, we urge you to remind everyone in your circles of influence to do the same. 

Knowledge is protection.  Connection is knowledge. 

Sign on to the newsletter list here:














[12]The Novel Coronavirus, 2019-nCoV, is Highly Contagious and More Infectious Than Initially Estimated.


[14]”In the particular circumstances of this outbreak, and provided certain conditions are met, the panel reached consensus that it is ethical to offer unproven interventions with as yet unknown efficacy and adverse effects, as potential treatment or prevention. Ethical criteria must guide the provision of such interventions. These include transparency about all aspects of care, informed consent, freedom of choice, confidentiality, respect for the person, preservation of dignity and involvement of the community.” [Emphasis added.]


One thought on “COVID-19: Who’s Telling You the Truth – and Who’s Not?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *